首页> 外文OA文献 >Access Control Enforcement Testing
【2h】

Access Control Enforcement Testing

机译:访问控制执行测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A policy-based access control architecture comprises Policy Enforcement Points (PEPs), which are modules that intercept subjects access requests and enforce the access decision reached by a Policy Decision Point (PDP), the module implementing the access decision logic. In applications, PEPs are generally implemented manually, which can introduce errors in policy enforcement and lead to security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose an approach to systematically test and validate the correct enforcement of access control policies in a given target application. More specifically, we rely on a two folded approach where a static analysis of the target application is first made to identify the sensitive accesses that could be regulated by the policy. The dynamic analysis of the application is then conducted using mutation to verify for every sensitive access whether the policy is correctly enforced. The dynamic analysis of the application also gives the exact location of the PEP to enable fixing enforcement errors detected by the analysis. The approach has been validated using a case study implementing an access control policy.
机译:基于策略的访问控制体系结构包括策略执行点(PEP),它们是拦截主体访问请求并执行策略决策点(PDP)所达到的访问决策的模块,该模块实现访问决策逻辑。在应用程序中,PEP通常是手动实现的,这可能会在策略实施中引入错误并导致安全漏洞。在本文中,我们提出了一种系统地测试和验证给定目标应用程序中访问控制策略的正确实施的方法。更具体地说,我们依赖于两种方法:首先对目标应用程序进行静态分析,以识别可能由策略调节的敏感访问。然后使用变异对应用程序进行动态分析,以验证每个敏感访问策略是否正确执行。应用程序的动态分析还提供了PEP的确切位置,从而可以修复分析检测到的执行错误。该方法已通过使用访问控制策略的案例研究得到验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号